Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2011 Mar 10;34(4):356–365. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.002

Table 3.

Final linear regression results Program Director attitudes, with dependent variable: “scientifically-supported treatments can be useful” Program Director sample n = 296.

Unstandardized coefficients B Standardized coefficients beta t Sig.
Research affiliation .152 .128 2.266 .024*
Level of education .125 .208 3.720 .000***
Internet score .017 .172 2.608 .010**
Growth score .015 .135 1.863 .063
Influence score –.025 –.098 –1.512 .132
Mission score .006 .049 .722 .471
Autonomy score .005 .038 .604 .547

Adjusted R2 = .143.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .000.