Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 26;8(9):e72633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072633

Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the association between MGMT promoter methylation and NSCLC.

Tumor
Control
M-H pooled ORb
D+L pooled ORa
Heterogeneity
Group M+ N M+ N OR (95%CI) OR (95%CI) I 2 (%) P τ2
Control group
Auologous 202  818 69 810 4.16 (3.02, 5.72) 3.74 (2.54, 5.51) 16.6 0.276 0.080
Heterogeneous  93  342  0 160 20.45 (5.83, 71.73) 11.18 (2.14, 58.35) 34.0 0.194 1.208
Ethnicity
Asian  92  515  6 405 10.96 (5.20, 23.14) 7.36 (2.33, 23.19) 45.1 0.105 0.8807
Caucasian 203  645 63 565 4.00 (2.85, 5.60) 3.49 (2.37, 5.14) 8.9 0.358 0.0418
Method
MSP 214  939 46 821 6.17 (4.28, 8.91) 5.31 (3.00, 9.41) 40.2 0.060 0.4155
Q-MSP  81  221 23 149 3.06 (1.75, 5.33) 2.84 (1.62, 5.00) 0.0 0.674 <0.0001
Total 295 1160 69 970 5.10 (3.77, 6.91) 4.43 (2.85, 6.89) 32.0 0.095 0.2476

D+L pooled ORa: the result from random-effects model;M-H pooled ORb: the result from fixed-effects model.