Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Knee Surg. 2009 Oct;22(4):347–357. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247773

Table 6.

Comparison of Radiographic Signs of Degeneration in Patients with Normal Menisci and those with Partial Meniscectomy Meniscus Status at ACL Reconstruction

Author Year Years to follow-up Mean (Range) Percent Follow-up Normal menisci Partial meniscectomy Significance Radiographic Classification System Utilized
Hart 2005 10 (9–13) 62 % 13 % (2/15) 44 % (7/16) p = 0.11 Ahlback
Grade ≥ 1
Hertel 2005 10.7 (9.2–12) 61 % 5 % (1/20) 48 % (14/29) p = 0.001 IKDC System
Grade B,C, or D
Giron 2005 5 83 % 18 % (3/22) 31 % (6/16) p = 0.09 IKDC System
Grade B,C, or D
Patel 2000 5.9 (5–8.5) 73 % 9 % (1/11) 100 % (13/13) p = 0.00001 Fairbank
Grade ≥ 1
Aglietti 1997 7 (5.2–8.7) 66 % 9 % (2/23) 35 % (7/20) p = 0.06 IKDC System
Grade C or D
Aglietti 1994 4.5 (3–7.5) 100 % 10 % (2/20) 58 % (11/19) p = 0.02 HSS Evaluation Score < 26