Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 19;24(10):1519–1527. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012080857

Table 2.

Summary of factors that explain differences in conclusions between randomized control trials and cohort studies

Variable Clinical Trial Cohort Study
Selected patients Patients are often selected; no kidney dysfunction before treatment Unselected patients who can have CKD before TDF initiation
Therapeutic history Frequently naive patients Frequently ARV-experienced patients
Associated ARVs Frequently NNRTI Frequently boosted PI
HIV disease Often, recent diagnosis of HIV infection Patients more susceptible to having advanced HIV disease
Studied kidney measure Decrease of GFR <90 ml/min per 1.72 m2 or even <60 ml/min per 1.72 m2 Modification of eGFR that can significantly decrease while remaining >90 ml/min per 1.72. m2
Follow-up and duration of TDF exposure Short follow-up (<1 yr) and duration of TDF treatment Frequently, longer follow-up and exposure duration
Study finding More commonly financed by pharmaceutical companies More commonly independent studies
Resulting effect Patients whose kidney function is very likely to benefit from the antiviral effect of TDF Patients more at risk of cardiovascular and kidney complications of long-term HIV infection and ARV treatment

NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure