Table 3. Malaria Expenditures, Population at Risk, Cases, Funding Sources, Activities, and Personnel Time Across Study Provinces.
| Apayao | Laguna | Cavite | Benguet | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 1998 | 2000 | 2007 | 2004 | 2008 | |
| Program phase1 | CLM | CLM | E | E | E/OB | E/OB | E | E | CLM | CLM/E | POR | E | POR |
| Population at risk2 | 103,633 | 106,642 | 109,742 | 8,532 | 8,760 | 8,995 | 9,236 | 8,892 | 9,814 | 13,101 | 11,033 | 5,841 | 6,325 |
| Indigenous malaria cases3 | 246 | 35 | 11 | 3 | 256 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Imported malaria cases3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 22 | 1 | 3 | 12 | N/A |
| Total expenditures4 | $747,368 | $570,603 | $360,114 | $27,844 | $103,537 | $110,093 | $40,699 | $43,562 | $42,484 | $23,575 | $6,986 | $16,185 | $15,931 |
| Expenditures per PAR4 | $7.21 | $5.35 | $3.28 | $3.26 | $11.82 | $12.24 | $4.41 | $4.90 | $4.33 | $1.81 | $0.63 | $2.77 | $2.52 |
| Funding sources | |||||||||||||
| Local government | 14.9% | 16.5% | 23.9% | 78.8% | 42.2% | 33.2% | 69.7% | 49.6% | 29.7% | 34.4% | 59.1% | 49.5% | 48.2% |
| Provincial government | 3.9% | 4.1% | 5.5% | 7.8% | 18.9% | 11.3% | 13.3% | 31.5% | <1% | <1% | 15.4 | 18.3% | 15.2% |
| National government | 1.7% | 1.8% | 2.5% | 13.1% | 38.8% | 55.4% | 16.8% | 18.9% | 70.3% | 65.5% | 25.6% | 26.4% | 26.7% |
| Global Fund | 79.5% | 77.4% | 68.0% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | - | - | - | 5.8% | 9.8% |
| Malaria activities | |||||||||||||
| Diagnosis & Treatment | 18.3% | 12.6% | 13.2% | 12.5% | 15.7% | 7.1% | 12.7% | 10.6% | 7.8% | 4.1% | <1% | 14.2% | 16.5% |
| Prev & Vector Control | 50.8% | 41.6% | 40.5% | 26.2% | 52.2% | 66.6% | 32.5% | 45.8% | 28.1% | 30.4% | - | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| Surveillance | 4.2% | 4.6% | 5.7% | 15.3% | 8.4% | 5.7% | 14.7% | 8.7% | 36.2% | 43.7% | 20.1% | 46.6% | 46.7% |
| IEC5 | 5.9% | 7.6% | 7.7% | 8.8% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 8.5% | 5.5% | 6.6% | 13.1% | 48.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% |
| Management/M&E6 | 20.8% | 33.7% | 32.9% | 37.2% | 17.0% | 15.2% | 31.8% | 29.4% | 21.4% | 8.7% | 31.3% | 14.4% | 12.1% |
| Personnel | |||||||||||||
| % of total expenditures | 20.3% | 24.3% | 31.8% | 95.2% | 59.1% | 46.3% | 85.2% | 63.4% | 88.7% | 79.8% | 100.0% | 91.4% | 90.2% |
| Count | 123 | 121 | 16 | 28 | 61 | 36 | 34 | 33 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 29 | 30 |
| FTE equivalent7 | 33.33 | 30.66 | 8.25 | 5.68 | 14.40 | 11.29 | 6.70 | 4.33 | 5.86 | 3.47 | 1.04 | 2.85 | 2.86 |
| Staffing ratio8 | 3.69 | 3.95 | 1.94 | 4.93 | 4.24 | 3.19 | 5.07 | 7.62 | 2.22 | 3.17 | 11.59 | 10.18 | 10.49 |
CLM = controlled low-endemic malaria; E = elimination; OB = outbreak; POR = prevention of reintroduction.
Population at risk (PAR) is defined as the total population residing in endemic barangays/municipalities. For Apayao, all municipalities are endemic. For Laguna, the endemic municipalities are San Gregorio, Ala minos ; Santiago II, San Pablo City; Bautista,and San Pablo City. For Benguet, the endemic municipalities are Itogon, Sablan, and Tuba; PAR figures for 2008 are projected from 2004 PAR based on the provincial population growth rate as none of the population are considered at risk after malaria-free certification. For Cavite, the endemic municipalities are Maragondon, Silang and Ternate.
N/A = No applicable records were found.
All expenditures are adjusted to 2010 USD.
IEC = Information and Education Campaign
M & E = Monitoring and Evaluation
Total time allocation for all malaria personnel are converted to the equivalent hours of a full-time employee (FTE).
The staffing ratio is derived by dividing the personnel count by the FTE equivalent.