Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 15;28(10):1353–1363. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2508-z

Table 1.

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Major Clinical Trials

Study Patients (treated/control) Cell Type Route Time Post-AMI Imaging Technique Follow-Up (months) Outcomes in Treated Group
Strauer43 10/10 BMC IC 5–9 days LV angiogram, DSE 3 Improved infarct size, volumes & wall motion, safety outcomes, No difference in EF
TOPCARE-AMI44,45 29 vs. 30 BMC vs. EPC IC < 5 days LV angiogram, Cardiac MRI 4 & 12 Improved EF by 8 %, infarct size, volumes & wall motion, + safety outcomes
BOOST46 30/30 BMC IC 4–8 days Cardiac MRI 6 & 18 Transient improved EF by 6.7 %, + safety outcomes
Chen47 34/35 MSC IC 18 days LV angiogram, Echo 6 Improved EF by 18 %, infarct size, wall motion & LVEDV, + safety outcomes
Fernandez-Aviles48 20/13 BMC IC 12–20 days Cardiac MRI, LV angiogram 6 Improved EF by 5.8 %, volumes & wall motion, + safety outcomes
Bartunek49 19/16 BMC (CD133+) IC 10–12 days LV angiogram, SPECT 4 Improved EF by 7 % & wall motion
Ruan50 9/11 BMC IC < 7 days Echo 6 Improved EF by 6 %, volumes & + safety outcomes
REPAIR-AMI51,52 102/102 BMC IC 3–7 days LV angiogram, Cardiac MRI 4, 12 & 24 Improved EF by 5.5 %, volumes & mortality, + safety outcomes
ASTAMI53 47/50 BMC IC 4–7 days SPECT, Echo, Cardiac MRI 12 + safety outcomes, no difference in EF
Janssens54 33/34 BMC IC < 1 day Cardiac MRI 4 Improved infarct size, No difference in EF, + safety outcomes
Fincell55 40/40 BMC IC 2–6 days LV angiogram, IVUS, Echo, 6 Improved EF by 7 %, + safety outcomes
Krause56 20/0 BMC Trans-endocardial 10.5 days Echo, EMM, LV angiogram 6 & 12 Improved electromechanical parameters, Improved EF by 6.8 %, + safety outcomes
REGENT57 80 vs. 80/40 BMC vs. CD34+CXCR4+ IC 7 days LV angiogram, Cardiac MRI 6 No difference in EF or volumes
MYSTAR58 60 BMC IM vs. IC 3–6 weeks vs. 3–4 months LV angiogram 9–12 Improved EF but no significant difference between groups
Hare59 53 MSC (allogeneic) IV 1–10 days Echo, Cardiac MRI 12 Improved EF by 5.2 % & volumes, Decreased arrhythmias, + safety outcomes
LateTIME60 58/29 BMC IC 2–3 weeks Cardiac MRI 6 No difference in EF or volumes
Penn27 19/6 MAPC (allogeneic) Adventitial 2–5 days Echo 4 Significant improved EF by 12.6 % & volumes, + safety outcomes
APOLLO61 9/4 ASC IC < 1 day Cardiac MRI, SPECT 6 Improved EF by 4 %, scar formation, & perfusion defect, + safety outcomes
Osiris62 110/110 MSC (allogeneic) IV < 7 days Cardiac MRI 6 Decreased hypertrophy, arrhythmias & re-hospitalizations, + safety outcomes (No mention of EF)
TIME63,64 43/24 vs. 36/17 BMC IC 3 vs. 7 days Cardiac MRI 6 No difference in EF or effect on LV function
SWISS-AMI65 59 vs. 49/60 BMC IC 1 week vs. 4 weeks Cardiac MRI Ongoing No effect on LV function at 4 months

BMC bone marrow-derived cells; IC intracoronary; LV left ventricular; DSE dobutamine stress echocardiogram; EF ejection fraction; EPC endothelial progenitor cells; MRI magnetic resonance imaging; + positive; MSC mesenchymal stem cells; Echo echocardiogram; LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume; SPECT single photon emission computed tomography; IVUS intravascular ultrasound; EMM electromechanical mapping; CXCR4 CXC chemokine receptor type-4; IM intramuscular; IV intravenous; MAPC multipotent adult progenitor cells; ASC adipose-derived stem cells