Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 5;110(39):15674–15679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314045110

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Accuracy of contact prediction. Comparison of GREMLIN with DCA (A), PSICOV (B), MIc (C), and GREMLIN when no prior information is used (D). Each point corresponds to a protein, the axes indicate the accuracy of the top ranked L/2 contacts predicted by the indicated methods. (E) (solid lines) Average accuracy for varying numbers of predictions; (broken lines) fraction of targets where GREMLIN was more accurate than the indicated method. Dependence of accuracy of the top L/5 (F) and L/2 (G) predictions on the alignment depth for a subset of 75 targets with deep alignments.