Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2013 Mar 14;425(9):1433–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.03.013

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Table of key quantities that can be computed within the MWC framework. (a) The activity curve on a linear scale for two MWC molecules: a one-site receptor with Δε = εI − εA = −4 kBT, Kd(A)=1µM and Kd(I)=148µM, giving a difference in binding energy of εb(A)εb(I)=logKd(A)Kd(I)=4kBT; and a two-site receptor with Δε = εI − εA = −4 kBT, Kd(A)=1µM, and Kd(I)=12.2µM, giving a binding energy difference of εb(A)εb(I)=logKd(A)Kd(I)=2kBT. (b) The activity curves from (a) with concentrations on a log scale. The transition point concentration c* = 40.6 µM and effective Hill coefficient heff = 1 are shown with vertical and horizontal lines, respectively, for the one-site receptor. (c) This table gives formulas for some of the key parameters of interest in both statistical mechanics and thermodynamic language. Here, n is the total number of binding sites on the receptor, L = e−βΔε is the conformational equilibrium constant where Δε = εI − εA is the difference in conformational energy between the inactive and active state, Kd(I)=c0eβ(εb(I)μ0) is the inactive state's dissociation constant for ligand binding, Kd(A)=c0eβ(εb(A)μ0) is the active state's dissociation constant for ligand binding and c is the ligand concentration.