Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2226–2237. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20156

Table 2.

Statistical t and p Values for ROI Analysis Comparing Encoding Data for Trials that Led to Subsequent False Alarm with Data for Trials that Led to Subsequent Correct Rejections

ROI n t Statistic p
RSC LH 16 3.20 .005*
RSC RH 15 2.44 .028*
MPFC LH 16 2.88 .011*
MPFC RH 16 .94 .36
LP LH 16 2.64 .018*
LP RH 16 2.13 .05*
PHC LH 16 .85 .4
PHC RH 16 .40 .69
OTS LH 16 −.53 .6

All p values are for two-tailed significance.

*

p < .05.