Table 3.

ROI Statistical Values of Subsequent Memory of Old Items

ROI	Context	Memory	Con × Mem
RSC LH	F(1, 10) = 3.07, ns	F(1, 10) = 0.3, ns	F(1, 10) = 3.2, p < .1
RSC RH	F(1, 10) = 6.37, p < .03	F(1, 10) = 0.06, ns	F(1, 10) = 0.28, ns
MPFC LH	F(1, 10) = 3.01, ns	F(1, 10) = 3.20, ns	F(1, 10) = 0.01, ns
MPFC RH	F(1, 10) = 26.58, p < .001	F(1, 10) = 0.48, ns	F(1, 10) = 0.32, ns
LP LH	F(1, 10) = 14.01, p < .004	F(1, 10) = 0.07, ns	F(1, 10) = 0.42, ns
LP RH	F(1, 10) = 7.53, p < .02	F(1, 10) = 1.05, ns	F(1, 10) = 1.93, ns
PHC LH	F(1, 10) = 0.91, ns	F(1, 10) = 0.07, ns	F(1, 10) = 2.11, ns
PHC RH	F(1, 10) = 0.45, ns	F(1, 10) = 5.94, p < .04	F(1, 10) = 3.31, p < .1
OTS LH	F(1, 10) = 0.26, ns	F(1, 10) = 0.09, ns	F(1, 10) = 4.81, p < .05

Statistical F and p values for ROI ANOVA looking at the main effect of context compared to the main effect of memory (i.e., recognition of old items) for encoding data of old items.

All p values are for two-tailed significance.