Table 4.
Corpus callosum segment volume predicts receptive language, typical controls
| Predictor → outcome | Typical controls |
ICV |
R2adj | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC segment | |||||||
| B (SE) | β | 95% CI | B (SE) | β | 95% CI | ||
| CC Seg 1 + ICV → Listening to Paragraphs | 0.01 (0.004) | 0.4 | 0.0002 to 0.02 | −0.10 (0.21) | −0.1 | −0.51 to 0.30 | 0.09 |
| CC Seg 4 + ICV → CELF Receptive | 0.10 (0.04) | 0.3 | 0.01 to 0.18 | −1.38 (1.12) | −0.2 | −3.56 to 0.84 | 0.10 |
| CC Seg 5 + ICV → Listening to Paragraphs | 0.01 (0.003) | 0.4 | 0.001 to 0.01 | −0.12 (0.22) | −0.1 | −0.54 to 0.30 | 0.06 |
| CC Seg 5 + ICV → Verbal Comprehension | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.4 | 0.004 to 0.07 | 1.87 (1.18) | 0.3 | −0.44 to 4.20 | 0.19 |
| CC Seg 5 + ICV → J-N Grammaticality | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.4 | 0.004 to 0.03 | −0.41 (0.49) | −0.1 | −1.36 to 0.56 | 0.05 |
| CC Seg 5 + ICV → Perceptual Organization Index | 0.03 (0.01) | 0.5 | 0.01 to 0.05 | −2.35 (0.82) | −0.5 | −3.98 to −0.75 | 0.14 |
CC Seg, Corpus callosum segment; ICV, intracranial volume; J-N, Johnson–Newport. ICV unstandardized regression coefficients were multiplied by a constant.