Table 5.
Corpus callosum segment volume predicts receptive language, people with injury
| People with injury | CC segment |
FVL |
ICV |
R2adj | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | β | 95% CI | B (SE) | β | 95% CI | B (SE) | β | 95% CI | ||
| CC Seg 2 + ICV + FVL → Listening to Paragraphs | 0.01 (0.006) | 0.52 | 0.001 to 0.03 | −3.84 (5.04) | −0.20 | −14.0 to 5.7 | −0.25 (0.18) | −0.31 | −0.60 to 0.11 | 0.14 |
| CC Seg 2 + ICV + FVL → Verbal Comprehension | 0.09 (0.04) | 0.44 | 0.01 to 0.18 | −72.76 (33.63) | −0.46 | −137.68 to −5.85 | −0.33 (1.21) | −0.05 | −2.70 to 2.03 | 0.16 |
| CC Seg 2 + ICV + FVL → CELF Receptive | 0.09 (0.04) | 0.42 | 0.01 to 0.18 | −89.97 (34.44) | −0.54 | −157.81 to −22.83 | −2.04 (1.24) | −0.30 | −4.47 to 0.38 | 0.14 |
| CC Seg 3 + ICV + FVL → Listening to Paragraphs | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.55 | 0.004 to 0.03 | −7.75 (4.18) | −0.40 | −16.14 to 0.25 | −0.40 (0.18) | −0.50 | −0.75 to −0.05 | 0.11 |
| CC Seg 3 + ICV + FVL → Verbal Comprehension | 0.12 (0.05) | 0.47 | 0.02 to 0.22 | −99.50 (29.25) | −0.63 | −155.60 to −40.95 | −1.44 (1.29) | −0.22 | −3.98 to 1.08 | 0.07 |
| CC Seg 3 + ICV + FVL → PO Index | 0.15 (0.04) | 0.57 | 0.07 to 0.23 | −113.11 (23.27) | −0.72 | −157.96 to 66.75 | −4.42 (1.0) | −0.69 | −6.40 to −2.49 | 0.16 |
| CC Seg 5 + ICV + FVL→ Verbal Comprehension | 0.04 (0.02) | 0.53 | 0.01 to 0.07 | −70.59 (33.64) | −0.45 | −136.92 to −5.04 | −0.55 (1.24) | −0.09 | −2.98 to 1.89 | 0.21 |
| CC Seg 5 + ICV + FVL → PO Index | 0.03 (0.01) | 0.41 | 0.01 to 0.06 | −90.81 (27.04) | −0.58 | −144.19 to −38.21 | −3.25 (0.99) | −0.50 | −5.19 to −1.30 | 0.17 |
Note. CC Seg, Corpus callosum segment; FVL, fractional volume loss; PO, Perceptual Organization. ICV, intracranial volume. ICV unstandardized regression coefficients were multiplied by a constant.