Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;92(8):656–665. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31829b4c16

Table 2.

Changes in Outcome at End-Of-Treatment, Data Pooled from Both Groups*

Outcome Change at EOT*
[95% CI]
P Value
Change in score on LE Fugl-Meyer Assessment 1.4 [0.4, 2.4] <0.01
Change in maximum dorsiflexion angle (°) 6.5 [2.1, 10.9] <0.01
Change in ankle movement tracking error ** −1.9 [−3.3, −0.5] 0.01
Change in maximum dorsiflexion moment (Nm) 1.4 [0.2, 2.6] 0.02
Change in time to complete mEFAP (sec) ** −6.3 [−11.1, −1.5] 0.01
Change in dorsiflexion angle at initial contact (°) −0.7 [−2.3, 0.9] 0.41
Change in peak knee flexion during swing (°) −0.1 [−4.0, 3.8] 0.96
Change in peak hip flexion during swing (°) 0.0 [−2.5, 2.5] 0.97
Change in gait velocity (cm/sec) 2.1 [−1.2, 5.4] 0.21
Change in stride length (cm) 2.9 [−0.7, 6.5] 0.12
Change in cadence (steps/min) −0.2 [−2.2, 1.8] 0.81

Abbreviations: CCNMES, contralaterally controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation; CYCLIC, cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation; EOT, end of treatment; LE, lower extremity; mEFAP, modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile

*

Change estimates at end-of-treatment derived from linear mixed model.

**

On this scale, a reduction in the score indicates improvement in the condition being evaluated.