Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 8;30(8):951–962. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.789894

Table 1.

Effects of filtering visual short wavelengths (<480 nm) on nighttime sleep structure variables.

Sleep variable Comparator (C) Mean ± SEM Baseline (B) Mean ± SEM Intervention (I) Mean ± SEM p C vs. B C vs. I
Total sleep time (min) 476.67 ± 17.32 397.67 ± 18.67 437.78 ± 14.37 0.0107 0.0067 0.2375
Sleep efficiency (%) 91.42 ± 1.40 78.14 ± 4.01 85.94 ± 3.32 0.0221 0.0142 0.5763
Stage 1 (min) 29.00 ± 7.97 22.67 ± 3.92 20.39 ± 2.50 0.5416
Stage 2 (min) 231.08 ± 9.87 217.28 ± 15.17 238.56 ± 7.53 0.2371
Stage 3 (min) 18.58 ± 1.42 19.83 ± 2.53 22.06 ± 2.60 0.6210
Stage 4 (min) 77.83 ± 10.37 51.83 ± 5.11 63.31 ± 9.97 0.1667
REM (min) 120.17 ± 13.10 85.50 ± 9.17 92.67 ± 9.73 0.1168
NREM (S2 + S3 + S4) (min) 327.50 ± 12.64 288.94 ± 17.00 323.92 ± 12.09 0.0476 0.0771 0.9973
SWS (S3 + S4) (min) 96.42 ± 9.71 71.67 ± 5.46 85.37 ± 10.57 0.1982
Sleep onset latency (min) 13.27 ± 5.76 14.37 ± 2.33 10.59 ± 1.89 0.6643
REM onset latency (min) 59.25 ± 11.21 103.28 ± 20.78 72.00 ± 4.05 0.0907
WASO (min) 22.42 ± 5.80 73.00 ± 21.43 37.39 ± 17.64 0.0237 0.0338 0.9147

Data represent mean ± SEM. Data were subjected to repeated-measures one-factor (Group) mixed-model ANOVA. If a significant main effect was observed, the analysis was followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison tests to assess differences between intervention and baseline groups relative to the comparator group.