Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2013 Apr 24;27(7):1045–1057. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835cffd9

Table 1. Comparison of the phylodynamic patterns of MSM, IDU and non-B heterosexual epidemics.

Frequency of infections in cluster groups (% cases) Cluster interval


Risk group Location Inclusion criteria Unique Small 2–10 Large +10 Median (months) <6 months (% cases)
MSM Montreal Acute/PHIa 30 42 28 15 27
MSM Amsterdam Recent < 18 months 43 57 0 17 25
MSM UK/London PHI/Chronic 60 28 12 22/14 16/25
MSM France PHI (Cohort) 83 17 0 15 30
MSM Denmark PHI/Chronic 51 18 31
MSM Belgium Recent <1 year 53 28 19
MSM Switzerland Acute/PHI/Recent 64 0 36
Mixed North Carolina PHI/Chronic 66 29 4
IDU/HET Switzerland Acute/PHI/Recent 41 0 63
IDU/HET Montreal Acute/PHI/Recent 30 45 25
HET Denmark PHI/Chronic 85 9 6
Non-B Montreal PHI/Chronic 74 24 2
Non-B UK PHI/Chronic 75 20 5
Non-B Switzerland Acute/PHI/Recent 78 22 0
Non-B Belgium Recent (<1 year) 87 12 0

Data were extracted from studies performed in Quebec [27,29], Netherlands [94,182], United Kingdom [31,90,93], France [105], Denmark [101], Belgium [111], Switzerland [86,103] and North Carolina [106] to elaborate the relative role of nonclustered (unique), small clustered (2–10) and large clustered (10+) networks in different settings. The median cluster intervals and the percentage of linked infections occurring within 6-month intervals substantiate the relative role of early infection. HET, heterosexual; PHI, primary HIV infection.

a

The Montreal study included drug-naive and treated chronic populations to establish cluster size but excluded these samples from analysis of cluster intervals.