. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 30.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Jun;49(0):365–377. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9463-9

Table 3.

Tested and Effective Program Adoption, Sustainability, and Participation in the Intervention (CTC) and Control (C) Communities

OUTCOMES	PROGRAM 2007		PROGRAM 2010		TEACHER 2007		TEACHER 2010
OUTCOMES	CTC	C	CTC	C	CTC	C	CTC	C
ADOPTION: Total number of programs	44	19	43	26	40	32	29	17
ADOPTION: Total number of programs	W+=60, W-=6, N=11, p<0.05		W+=55, W-=11, N=11, p<0.05		W+=38, W-=17, N=10, p<0.32		W+=41.5, W- =13.5 N = 10, p <0.17
SUSTAINABILITY: Percentage of programs delivered in both 2007 and 2010	CTC=78% C=43%				CTC=48% C=18%
	W+=43, W-=2, N=9, p<.05				W+=35, W-=10, N=9, p<0.16
PARTICIPATION: Total number of participants	11,261	3864	20,932	5,220	13,146	3263	5877	1556
PARTICIPATION: Total number of participants	W+=49, W-=6, N=10, p <0.05		W+=62, W-=16, N=12, p<0.08		W+=56, W-=10, N=11, p<0.05		W+=45, W-=10 N=10, p<0.09

Note: Significance tests were conducted using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/Signed_Rank_Test.html.Statistically significant (p<.05) differences based on two-tailed tests are indicated in bold.