. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Jun;51(0):370–384. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9557-z

Table 7.

Regression Models Predicting 2009 Implementation of Science-Based Prevention from Economic Variables

Indicator:	County Unemployment Rate (%)				Students Qualifying for Free Lunch (%)				Community Economic Problems
Indicator:	2009 Level		Annual Change – Post Downturn		2009 Level		Annual Change – Post Downturn		2009 Level

Predictor ^a	B	SD	B	SD	B	SD	B	SD	B	SD
CTC Communities (N = 11, df = 8)
Intercept	13.05	0.56 ***	13.01	0.54 ***	12.78	0.69 ***	12.96	0.56 ***	12.56	0.65 ***
Implementation level in 2007	0.60	0.70	0.33	0.67	0.41	0.79	0.20	0.72	0.51	0.81
Economic indicator	-.61	0.20 *	-2.82	0.95 *	-0.07	0.05	-5.42	2.06 *	-2.62	1.37 ⁺
R²		.51		.54		.21		.48		.33
Control Communities (N = 14, df = 11)
Intercept	7.11	1.16 ***	7.10	1.16 ***	6.98	1.15 ***	6.95	1.15 ***	7.00	1.18 ***
Implementation level in 2007	0.78	0.34 *	0.81	0.35 *	0.75	0.35 *	0.83	0.35 *	0.77	0.35 *
Economic indicator	0.36	0.48	1.80	2.51	0.05	0.08	-2.37	3.08	-0.01	2.55
R²		.34		.34		.33		.34		.31

Implementation scores are centered around the mean within coalition type. Economic indicators are centered around the overall mean across all coalitions.