Table 3. Evaluation of reporting quality in individual-based models in the HIV transmission and prevention literature (N=32).

Item	Total Number of Papers
	n (%)
1. Title and Abstract	32 (100.0)
2. Objective	30 (93.8)
3. Context	32 (100.0)
4. Model Justification	18 (56.3)
5. Structure	32 (100.0)
6. Assumptions	32 (100.0)
7. Validity of Sexual Behavior	32 (100.0)
8. Validity of Biology	31 (96.9)
9. Parameters	29 (90.6)
10. Time step	6 (18.8)
11. Heterogeneity	25 (78.1)
12. Interaction	32 (100.0)
13. Calibration	22 (68.8)
14. Sensitivity Analyses	29 (90.6)
15. Assumption Sensitivity	26 (81.3)
16. Stochastic Sensitivity	15 (46.9)
17. Internal Validity	1 (3.1)
18. Data Quality	29 (90.6)
19. Data Conversion	3 (9.4)
20. Results	31 (96.9)
21. Limitations and Strengths	28 (87.5)
22. Reproducibility	21 (65.6)
23. Discussion	32 (100.0)
24. Authorship and Funding	26 (81.3)