Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 9;53(8):2047–2056. doi: 10.1021/ci400225w

Table 1.

Analysis of the channel state in the deprotonated and protonated trajectories. Data was obtained and analyzed in MOLE 2.0 and assigned to specific channels using Wade's nomenclature. The centroid structures of the top five clusters of both trajectories from GROMOS++ clustering (see methods) are reported along with similar analysis of the 3EQM crystal structure in the Protein Databank. The channel widths are reported for each channel in the result (some channels have multiple openings detected by the algorithm).

S Channel Channel 5 2d Channel Channel 1
Crystal Structure 1.57 Å, 0.37 Å 0.87 Å Closed Closed
Deprotonated Cluster 1 (67%) 1.94 Å, 0.89 Å 0.46 Å, 1.10 Å 0.86 Å, 0.86 Å Closed
Deprotonated Cluster 2 (11%) 1.94 Å, 0.89 Å Closed 0.89 Å, 0.89 Å Closed
Deprotonated Cluster 3 (6%) 1.36 Å Closed 0.97 Å, 1.28 Å Closed
Deprotonated Cluster 4 (4%) 1.03 Å 0.97 Å, 0.95 Å, 0.95 Å Closed Closed
Deprotonated Cluster 5 (4%) 1.22 Å, 1.40 Å 1.04 Å Closed Closed
Protonated Cluster 1 (61%) Closed 1.48 Å Closed Closed
Protonated Cluster 2 (14%) Closed 1.37 Å Closed Closed
Protonated Cluster 3 (10%) 0.57 Å, 0.57 Å 0.84 Å, 0.84 Å, 0.84 Å Closed Closed
Protonated Cluster 4 (6%) Closed 1.19 Å 1.00 Å Closed
Protonated Cluster 5 (4%) Closed 0.83 Å, 0.78 Å 0.90 Å 0.70 Å