Table II.
Bias (MRER) and Precision (MARER) of Estimated Fixed and Random Effects for the Second Model/Sampling Design Scenario: Two-Compartment Linear PK Model with Sparse Sampling Design
| Methods | CL | V c | Q | Vp | ω 2 CL | ω 2 Vc | ω 2 Q | ω 2 Vp | σ 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRERa | |||||||||
| N MC = 1000 | −0.89 | −1.1 | −1.0 | −1.1 | −4.8 | 11 | 50 | −12 | −0.81 |
| N MC = 10000 | −0.65 | −0.15 | −1.8 | −1.5 | −4.0 | 22 | 52 | −6.7 | −2.5 |
| MARERa | |||||||||
| N MC = 1000 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 12 | 22 | 53 | 21 | 5.7 |
| N MC = 10000 | 1.9 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 12 | 30 | 54 | 23 | 5.4 |
MRER mean percent relative estimation error; MARER mean percent absolute relative estimation error. Total number of simulation trial used for MRER/MARER calculation = 100; number of subject for each simulation trial = 200; N MC the number of Monte Carlo parameters set used to compute the E-step of the MCPEM algorithm; CL population (typical) clearance; V c population (typical) distribution volume at central compartment; ω 2 CL population variance of CL; ω 2 Vc population variance of V c; σ 2 variance of intra-individual proportional error model
aBoth MCPEMGPU and MCPEMCPU produced identical results