Table 2. A “snapshot” of the biomedical workforce from 2009.
Number | ||
---|---|---|
Biomedical PhD students | ||
Total number | 83,000 | |
Number who started PhDs | 16,000 | |
Number awarded PhDs | 9,000 | |
Number who started postdoc | 5,800 | |
Average time to PhD (years) | 6–7 | |
Post-PhD workforce | % | |
Scientific research | 84,500 | 66 |
(Government research) | (7,000) | (6) |
(Academic research or teaching) | (55,000) | (43) |
(Industrial research) | (22,500) | (18) |
Related to science (not research) | 24,000 | 18 |
Unrelated to science | 17,000 | 13 |
Unemployed | 2,500 | 2 |
Total | 128,000 | 100 |
This snapshot (data from Workforce report, p32) shows that 16,000 students started PhDs in 2009, but only 9,000 students received PhDs in 2009: this suggests a completion rate of just 56%. The table also shows that 66% of PhD graduates go on to pursue careers in research. This suggests that just over one-third (66% of 56% = 37%) of those students who start PhDs go on to become scientific researchers in government, academic or industrial laboratories. The Workforce report emphasizes that these data are only approximate; for instance, estimates of postdoc numbers vary between 37,000 and 68,000, and estimates for the number of PhD students vary between 83,000 (shown here) and 56,800 (Table 1). Overall, however, it is clear to me that too many students start PhDs and that, on average, most PhD training programmes are strikingly inefficient at producing PhDs.