Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 1;4:679. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00679

Table 3.

Overview of the processing strategies used (in percentages) by the child with dyscalculia and the control group (including range of percentages) in the symbolic 0–100 and 0–1000 number line tasks including p-values and effect sizes.

Strategy Child with dyscalculia Control groupa Test results
0–100 0–1000 0–100 0–1000 0–100 0–1000
% % % % p-value zcc p-value zcc
Holistic 26.7 0.0 49.7 (30.0–73.3)b 22.0 (0.0–56.7)b .057 −1.84 .144 −1.18
Decomposed parallel 13.3 20.0 21.3 (10.0–46.7)b 55.3 (20.0–76.7)b .286 −0.62 .067 −1.72
Decomposed sequential 10.0 0.0 11.0 (6.7–23.3)b 1.7 (0.0–10.0)b .461 −0.11 .314 −0.53
Other 10.0 23.3 12.0 (0.0–30.0)b 15.0 (3.0–30.0)b .421 −0.22 .184 0.99
Undefined 40.0 56.7 6.0 (0.0–13.3)b 6.0 (0.0–26.7)b .000 6.59 .000 5.90
a

n = 10, numbers represent the mean percentage of the 10 control children.

b

Range of the percentages of the 10 control children, see appendix for individual results of the control children. Zcc, obvious direct analog of Cohen's d, subscript representing “case-controls.”