Table 1.
Summary of Methods Proposed for Aiding in Systematic Review
Ref # | Title | Year | Machine-Learning Algorithm(s) Used | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Text categorization models for high-quality article retrieval in internal medicine | 2005 | Naïve Bayes, Adaboost, SVM | First known method |
2 | A comparison of citation metrics to machine-learning filters for the identification of high-quality MEDLINE documents | 2006 | Support Vector Machines (SVM) | |
3 | Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification | 2006 | Perceptron based voting | |
4 | Optimizing feature representation for automated systematic review work prioritization | 2008 | SVM | Extensive research on Machine-learning features |
5 | Cross-topic learning for work prioritization in systematic review creation and update | 2009 | SVM | |
6 | A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews | 2010 | Factorized version of Complement Naïve Bayes (FCNB) | |
7 | Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews | 2010 | ensemble of SVMs | Uses active learning |
8 | Toward automating the initial screening phase of a systematic review | 2010 | Evolutionary SVM | |
9 | Exploiting the systematic review protocol for classification of medical abstracts | 2011 | FCNB |
Ref #: the citation in the References section (1-,9 respectively, correspond to Aphinyanaphongs et al, 2006; Aphinyanaphongs et al, 2005; Bekhuis and Demner-Fushman, 2010; A.M. Cohen et al, 2006; A.M. Cohen, 2008; A.M. Cohen et al, 2009; Frunza et al, 2011; Matwin et al, 2010; Wallace et al, 2010); Title: title of the paper; Year: the year in which the article is published.