Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 1;8(10):e75645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075645

Table 4. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis of the prophylactic effect of GTN on the incidence of PEP.

Subgroup Patients  RR (95%CI) Z P Heterogeneity
x2 I2 P
Topical route 184 1.00 [0.28, 3.53] 0.00 1.00 0.61 0% 0.43
Sublingual route 407 0.47 [0.28, 0.78] 2.93 0.003 0.79 0% 0.68
Transdermal route 1596 0.78 [0.55, 1.10] 1.42 0.16 6.22 36% 0.18
Low incidences of PEP 1638 0.88 [0.62, 1.26] 0.69 0.49 3.80 0% 0.58
High incidences of PEP 757 0.48 [0.32, 0.71] 3.63 0.00003 2.16 0% 0.71
Excluded one study[22] 2291 0.66 [0.51, 0.86] 3.08 0.002 9.69 7% 0.38
Excluded two studies[22,26] 2217 0.69 [0.53, 0.90] 2.71 0.007 8.15 2% 0.42