Table 4. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis of the prophylactic effect of GTN on the incidence of PEP.
Subgroup | Patients | RR (95%CI) | Z | P | Heterogeneity |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x2 | I2 | P | |||||
Topical route | 184 | 1.00 [0.28, 3.53] | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0% | 0.43 |
Sublingual route | 407 | 0.47 [0.28, 0.78] | 2.93 | 0.003 | 0.79 | 0% | 0.68 |
Transdermal route | 1596 | 0.78 [0.55, 1.10] | 1.42 | 0.16 | 6.22 | 36% | 0.18 |
Low incidences of PEP | 1638 | 0.88 [0.62, 1.26] | 0.69 | 0.49 | 3.80 | 0% | 0.58 |
High incidences of PEP | 757 | 0.48 [0.32, 0.71] | 3.63 | 0.00003 | 2.16 | 0% | 0.71 |
Excluded one study[22] | 2291 | 0.66 [0.51, 0.86] | 3.08 | 0.002 | 9.69 | 7% | 0.38 |
Excluded two studies[22,26] | 2217 | 0.69 [0.53, 0.90] | 2.71 | 0.007 | 8.15 | 2% | 0.42 |