Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;56(5):E114–E120. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004312

Table 2.

Participant and fracture characteristics

Participant characteristic No. (%)*
n = 50
Fracture characteristic No. (%)*
n = 50
Age, yr (mean ± SD) 48 ± 16 Fracture type
Sex  Closed 32 (64)
 Male 36 (72)  Open 18 (36)
 Female 14 (28) Type of treatment
Ethnicity  Plate fixation 22 (44)
 White 40 (80)  Reamed intramedullary nail 16 (32)
 Native Canadian 5 (10)  Conservative treatment 9 (18)
 Hispanic 4 (8)  Screws 2 (4)
 Southeast Asian 1 (2)  Nonreamed intramedullary nail 1 (2)
Time from injury, mo., mean ± SD (range) 34 ± 77 (0.5–555) Complications
 < 6 9 (18)  None 17 (34)
 6–12 4 (8)  Yes 33 (66)
 12–24 19 (38) Type of complication, n = 42
 > 24 18 (36)  Nonunion 13 (31)
Mechanism of injury  Delayed union 13 (31)
 Fall 19 (38)  Infection 7 (17)
 Motor vehicle accident 9 (18)  Wound healing problem 5 (12)
 Motorcycle motor vehicle accident 6 (12)  Hardware failure 2 (5)
 Pedestrian motor vehicle accident 4 (8)  Varus collapse 1 (2)
 Recreational vehicle accident 4 (8)  Posttraumatic arthritis 1 (2)
 Crush 3 (6) Reoperations
 Direct trauma — blunt 3 (6)  None 22 (44)
 Twist 2 (4)  Yes 28 (56)
Additional injuries Type of reoperation, n = 47
 None 27 (54)  Hardware removal 13 (28)
 Yes 23 (46)  Bone graft 11 (23)
 Total of 33 additional injuries  Revision open reduction internal fixation 8 (17)
  Upper extremity injury 11 (33)  Irrigation and debridement 6 (13)
  Other lower extremity injury 10 (30)  Sequestrectomy 4 (9)
  Spinal injury 5 (15)  Skin graft 2 (4)
  Head/facial injury 5 (15)  Arthrodesis 2 (4)
  Thoracic injury 2 (6)  Osteotomy 1 (2)
Location of fracture  None 22 (44)
 Tibia 42 (84)
 Femur 8 (16)

SD = standard deviation.

*

Unless otherwise indicated.

Patients may have had more than 1 additional injury.

Patients may have had multiple complications and reoperations.