Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 May 16;132(4):896–905.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.046

Table 4.

Evaluation of origin, ancestry and migrant generation as determinants of positive skin prick test differences among Latino children with and without asthma

Asthmatic Participants Non-asthmatic Participants

N Relative number of
positive skin prick
tests(95%CI)*
N Relative number of
positive skin prick
tests(95%CI)*
Model for number of positive skin prick tests 825 790
Region of origin
  Mexico 446 1.0 (Referent) 486 1.0 (Referent)
  Puerto Rico 127 1.31(1.021.69) 59 0.96(0.61–1.52)
  Central 77 1(0.81–1.23) 91 0.96(0.69–1.32)
  Caribbean 36 1.17(0.83–1.66) 55 0.94(0.58–1.54)
  South 11 1.03(0.49–2.15) 19 1.55(0.98–2.47)
  Mixed 128 1.27(1.031.56) 80 0.81(0.59–1.11)
Global ancestry proportion
  African 3.13(1.636.01) 4.99(1.1920.91)
  Native American 1.47(0.95–2.27) 1.51(0.84–2.71)
Generation in the U.S.
  First generation 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent)
  Second generation 0.97(0.77–1.22) 1.21(0.94–1.55)
  Third generation 1.14(0.84–1.55) 1.65(1.052.59)
*

Adjusted for gender, age, mother’s highest education level, first-born child status, breastfeeding, prenatal smoke, pet ownership in the first year of life, and daycare attendance.

Bold indicates significant antilog-β at α=0.05.