Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 2;3:2818. doi: 10.1038/srep02818

Table 3. Pooled odds ratio for COPD susceptibility, heterogeneity and publication bias in meta-anlysis: comparison of alleles and genotypes.

        Heterogeneity Publication bias
Comparison Study number OR (95% CI) P value I2 P heterogeneity Begg Egger
MMP1 -1607 1G/2G (rs1799750)              
1G vs. 2G 12 0.99 (0.89, 1.10) 0.81 53% 0.01 0.945 0.980
1G1G + 1G2G vs. 2G2G 12 1.03 (0.86, 1.22) 0.76 58% 0.007 1 0.352
1G1G vs. 1G2G + 2G2G 12 0.99 (0.81, 1.21) 0.94 58% 0.006 0.244 0.274
1G1G vs. 2G2G 12 0.93 (0.77, 1.12) 0.44 38% 0.08 0.732 0.568
MMP3 -1171 5A/6A (rs35068180)              
5A vs. 6A 5 0.88 (0.61, 1.27) 0.50 71% 0.009 0.806 0.441
5A5A + 5A6A vs. 6A6A 4 0.92 (0.58, 1.46) 0.73 58% 0.07 0.089 0.100
5A5Avs. 5A6A + 6A6A 4 0.91 (0.58, 1.41) 0.66 50% 0.11 0.089 0.049
5A5A vs. 6A6A 3 1.18 (0.76, 1.82) 0.46 0% 0.42 0.296 0.210
MMP9 -1562 C/T (rs3918242)              
C vs. T 12 0.83 (0.62, 1.12) 0.22 79% <0.0001 0.732 0.953
CC + CT vs. TT 11 0.75 (0.45, 1.24) 0.26 22% 0.24 0.533 0.100
CC vs. CT + TT 12 0.80 (0.57, 1.14) 0.22 81% <0.0001 0.837 0.732
CC vs. TT 11 0.71 (0.40, 1.24) 0.23 31% 0.15 0.533 0.082
MMP12 -82 A/G (rs2276109)              
A vs. G 6 0.98 (0.80, 1.20) 0.82 44% 0.11 0.133 0.066
AA + AG vs. GG 4 1.14 (0.59, 2.20) 0.69 0% 0.70 1 0.862
AA vs. AG + GG 6 0.96 (0.76, 1.21) 0.72 52% 0.07 0.452 0.078
AA vs. GG 4 1.17 (0.61, 2.25) 0.64 0% 0.71 1 0.938