Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell Biochem. 2011 Nov 2;362(0):93–102. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-1131-8

Table 2.

Fold change in mass, secondary structure, tertiary structure and chaperone activity in αA-crystallin mutants as compared to αA-wt

αA-samples Average Molar Massa Secondary Structureb Tertiary Structurec Chaperone activityd

αA-wt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
αA-R12C 2.10 3.00 2.00 0.60
αA-R21L 0.90 4.10 1.00 0.80
αA-R21W 1.20 6.20 3.10 0.60
αA-R49C 0.90 2.00 1.00 1.00
αA-R54C 1.40 3.00 3.20 0.90
αA-R116C 5.10 4.30 4.00 0.10
αA-R116H 7.00 5.20 5.00 0.30
a

Average molar mass values from Table 1 were used

b

Molar ellipticity values at around 195 nm from Fig. 4 indicative of α-helix content were used

c

Molar ellipticity values at around 293 nm (Trp signals) and at around 285 nm (Tyr/Trp Signals) from Fig. 5 were used

d

Chaperone activity assay values from Fig. 9b were used