Table 1.
Acceptability questions across all 3 videos (n (%)).
| Functional acceptability | Methadone (MTD), n = 11 | Buprenorphine (BUP), n = 13 | Total | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) How easy was it to play this module? Median (IQR) 1 (1,1) |
1—very easy | 53 (64%) | 64 (89%) | 117 (75%) | P < 0.005 |
| 2 | 16 (19%) | 7 (10%) | 23 (15%) | ||
| 3 | 7 (8%) | 1 (1%) | 8 (5%) | ||
| 4 | 4 (5%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (3%) | ||
| 5—very hard | 3 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (2%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (2) How easy was it to see and hear this module? Median (IQR) 1 (1,2) |
1—very easy | 52 (63%) | 52 (72%) | 104 (67%) | P = 0.172 |
| 2 | 19 (23%) | 14 (20%) | 33 (21%) | ||
| 3 | 7 (8%) | 4 (6%) | 11 (7%) | ||
| 4 | 3 (4%) | 1 (1%) | 4 (3%) | ||
| 5—very hard | 2 (2%) | 1 (1%) | 3 (2%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (3) How easy was it to understand this module? Median (IQR) 1 (1,1) |
1—very easy | 56 (68%) | 61 (85%) | 117 (75%) | P = 0.007 |
| 2 | 18 (22%) | 11 (15%) | 29 (19%) | ||
| 3 | 6 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (4%) | ||
| 4 | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | ||
| 5—very hard | 2 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1%) | ||
|
| |||||
| Educational acceptability | Methadone (MTD) |
Buprenorphine (BUP) | Total | P-value | |
|
| |||||
| (4) How effective was this module in teaching you something new about HIV/AIDS? Median (IQR) 1 (1,2) |
1—very effective | 48 (58%) | 60 (83%) | 108 (70%) | P < 0.005 |
| 2 | 16 (19%) | 6 (8%) | 22 (14%) | ||
| 3 | 13 (16%) | 2 (3%) | 15 (10%) | ||
| 4 | 4 (5%) | 2 (3%) | 6 (4%) | ||
| 5—not at all effective | 2 (2%) | 2 (3%) | 4 (2%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (5) How effective was this module in reminding you of things you knew about HIV/AIDS but had not been thinking about? Median (IQR) 1 (1,2) |
1—very effective | 54 (65%) | 60 (83%) | 114 (74%) | P = 0.021 |
| 2 | 24 (29%) | 7 (10%) | 31 (20%) | ||
| 3 | 4 (5%) | 2 (3%) | 6 (4%) | ||
| 4 | 1 (1%) | 1 (1%) | 2 (1%) | ||
| 5—not at all effective | 0 (0%) | 2 (3%) | 2 (1%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (6) How much did this module apply to situations in your life? Median (IQR) 2 (1,4) |
1—very applicable | 19 (23%) | 31 (43%) | 50 (32%) | P = 0.722 |
| 2 | 30 (36%) | 5 (7%) | 35 (23%) | ||
| 3 | 15 (18%) | 7 (10%) | 22 (14%) | ||
| 4 | 11 (13%) | 7 (10%) | 18 (12%) | ||
| 5—not at all applicable | 8 (10%) | 22 (30%) | 30 (19%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (7) How entertaining was this module? Median (IQR) 2 (1,3) |
1—very entertaining | 26 (31%) | 50 (70%) | 76 (49%) | P < 0.005 |
| 2 | 17 (20%) | 11 (15%) | 28 (18%) | ||
| 3 | 28 (34%) | 6 (8%) | 34 (22%) | ||
| 4 | 12 (15%) | 2 (3%) | 14 (9%) | ||
| 5—very boring | 0 (0%) | 3 (4%) | 3 (1%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (8) How appropriate was the length of the module? | 1—nowhere near long enough | 2 (2%) | 5 (7%) | 7 (4%) | P = 0.408 |
| 2—not quite long enough | 15 (18%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (10%) | ||
| 3—just about right | 58 (70%) | 65 (90%) | 123 (80%) | ||
| 4—a little too long | 6 (7%) | 2 (3%) | 8 (5%) | ||
| 5—much too long | 2 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1%) | ||
|
| |||||
| Comparative acceptability | Methadone (MTD) |
Buprenorphine (BUP) | Total | P-value | |
|
| |||||
| (9) Would it be better if the information was in a booklet instead of on the smartphone? | No | 76 (92%) | 62 (86%) | 138 (89%) | P = 0.312 |
| Yes | 7 (8%) | 10 (14%) | 17 (11%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (10) Would it be better if the information was on a full-size computer instead of on the smartphone? | No | 60 (72%) | 50 (69%) | 110 (71%) | P = 0.725 |
| Yes | 23 (28%) | 22 (31%) | 45 (29%) | ||
|
| |||||
| (11) Would it be better if the information was text instead of video? | No | 71 (86%) | 70 (97%) | 141 (91%) | P = 0.012 |
| Yes | 12 (14%) | 2 (3%) | 14 (9%) | ||
Questions 1–8 were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for ordinal variables, and Questions 9–11 were analyzed using Fisher's exact test for dichotomous variables and small sample sizes.