Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 5;8(10):1649–1660. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01540213

Table 3.

Characteristics of peritoneal dialysis techniques and peritonitis rates

Reference Access Type Cycler Based/Manual Open/Closed Drainage Buffer Peritonitis Incidence (%)
Observational studies (PD only)
Ponce (17) Tenckhoff Cycler Closed Lactate 12.0
Kilonzo (6) NA Manual NA NA 11.1
Ponce (18) Tenckhoff Cycler Closed Lactate 13.1
Hayat (28) Rigid NA NA NA NA
Gabriel (27) Tenckhoff Cycler Closed Lactate 16.7
Chitalia (26) Rigid Cycler/manuala Closed Lactate 3.4
Thongboonkerd (25) NA NA NA Lactate/bicarbonateb 0.0
Trang (24) NA NA Open Acetate 8.7
Howdieshell (23) Tenckhoff Cycler Closed Lactate 40.0
Sonnenblick (22) NA NA Closed Lactate 27.0
Indraprasit (21) Tenckhoff NA NA NA 20.0
Ojogwu (20) NA NA NA NA NA
Cameron (19) Rigid Manual NA Lactate NA
Studies with PD and EBP
Watcharotone (29) NA NA NA NA 3.2
George (37) Rigid Manual Closed Acetate 4.0
Gabriel (10) Tenckhoff Cycler Closed Lactate 18.0
Chow (36) NA NA NA NA NA
Mahajan (35) Rigid NA NA NA NA
Arogundade (34) Tenckhoff Manual NA NA 65.0
Phu (33) Rigid Manual Open Acetate 2.8 (41.6 cloudy dialysate)
Bellomo (15) Tenckhoff Manual Closed Lactate 25.0
Kumar (32) NA NA NA NA NA
Hadidy (31) NA NA NA NA NA
Werb (30) NA NA NA NA NA

The peritoneal dialysis techniques are tabulated according to the type of catheters, use of automated cyclers or manual exchanges, drainage system, and dialysate buffer. The peritonitis incidence listed is based on the rates reported in the studies. PD, peritoneal dialysis; NA, not available; EBP, extracorporeal blood purification.

a

The study compared cycler-based tidal PD with conventional PD using manual exchanges.

b

The study assessed differences in outcomes between bicarbonate and lactate-based PD fluids in AKI.