TABLE 2.
Assessment of Group Process for TRAIN Participantsa (n = 30)
| Items | Post 1b | Post 2c |
|---|---|---|
| I am better prepared for life in Moscow because of TRAIN. | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| I am better prepared to protect myself from AIDS because of TRAIN. | 3.7 | 4.0 |
| Other group members have caused me a lot of problems (reverse scored). | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| I got good ideas from other migrants. | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| TRAIN talks about things I can use in Moscow. | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| I am going to try some ideas I got from TRAIN. | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| The group meetings were helpful. | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| I would attend more TRAIN meetings | 3.7 | 4.0 |
| Train leaders understand what it is like to be a Tajik migrant. | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| I talk with my wife about what I learned in TRAIN. | 3.6 | 3.9 |
| I talk with other migrants about what I learned in TRAIN. | 3.7 | 4.0 |
| Migrants are better at making decisions because of TRAIN. | 3.7 | 3.9 |
| Total score | 43.2 | 44.8 |
| (90%) | (93%) |
Note.
a
No significant differences.
b
Post 1: Immediately after intervention (assessed on train).
c
Post 2: Three-months after intervention (assessed in Moscow).