Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 12;2013:573262. doi: 10.1155/2013/573262

Table 3.

Logarithm of saliva biofilm CFU/mL after treatment with different procedures (control compared with Ar gas or Ar plasma) and different agents (NaCl, H2O2, and EDTA) in changed order (first plasma then agent treatment).

Agent Procedure
Control Ar gas Ar plasma
NaCl control 7.17 ± 0.48  
N = 21
6.59 ± 0.48**  
N = 15
5.82 ± 0.52∗∗,#  
N = 8
H2O2 6.17 ± 0.80*  
N = 14
5.62 ± 0.86*  
N = 15
4.59 ± 0.77∗,∗∗,#  
N = 11
EDTA 5.92 ± 0.37*  
N = 8
6.25 ± 0.43**  
N = 14
4.51 ± 0.82∗,∗∗,#  
N = 16

Data are presented as mean lg (CFU/mL + 1) ± SD.

Ar: argon; CHX: 0.1% chlorhexidine; OCT: 0.1% octenidine; PHMB: 0.1% polyhexanide; NaOCl: 0.6% sodium hypochlorite; H2O2: 1.5% hydrogen peroxide; EDTA: 20% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.

*P < 0.05 versus NaCl control (within columns); **P < 0.05 versus control procedure (within rows); # P < 0.05 comparing Ar plasma versus Ar gas (within rows), two-sided Mann-Whitney U test, and reduction in saliva CFU/mL. P values were Bonferroni corrected.