Trust |
Trust or intimidating behavior is not assessed. |
First codes of behavior are adopted in some clinical departments. |
CEO and clinical leaders establish a trusting environment for all staff by modeling appropriate behaviors and championing efforts to eradicate intimidating behaviors. |
High levels of (measured) trust exist in all clinical areas; self-policing of codes of behavior is in place. |
Accountability |
Emphasis is on blame; discipline is not applied equitably or with transparent standards; no process exists for distinguishing “blameless” from “blameworthy” acts. |
The importance of equitable disciplinary procedures is recognized, and some clinical departments adopt these procedures. |
Managers at all levels accord high priority to establishing all elements of safety culture; adoption of uniform equitable and transparent disciplinary procedures begins across the organization. |
All staff recognize and act on their personal accountability for maintaining a culture of safety; equitable and transparent disciplinary procedures are fully adopted across the organization. |
Identifying unsafe conditions |
Root cause analysis is limited to adverse events; close calls (“early warnings”) are not recognized or evaluated. |
Pilot “close call” reporting programs begin in few areas; some examples of early intervention to prevent harm can be found. |
Staff in many areas begin to recognize and report unsafe conditions and practices before they harm patients. |
Close calls and unsafe conditions are routinely reported, leading to early problem resolution before patients are harmed; results are routinely communicated. |
Strengthening systems |
Limited or no efforts exist to assess system defenses against quality failures and to remedy weaknesses. |
RCAs begin to identify the same weaknesses in system defenses in many clinical areas, but systematic efforts to strengthen them are lacking. |
System weaknesses are cataloged and prioritized for improvement. |
System defenses are proactively assessed, and weaknesses are proactively repaired. |
Assessment |
No measures of safety culture exist. |
Some measures of safety culture are undertaken but are not widespread; little if any attempt is made to strengthen safety culture. |
Measures of safety culture are adopted and deployed across the organization; efforts to improve safety culture are beginning. |
Safety culture measures are part of the strategic metrics reported to the board; systematic improvement initiatives are under way to achieve a fully functioning safety culture. |