Table 4.
Standardized β RUF coefficients for zebra in each study region
| Central Delta (n = 7 zebra) | Peripheral Delta (n = 7 zebra) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significant coefficients | Significant coefficients | |||||||||
Mean 
|
P (Mean  = 0) |
+ | − | Best predictor (no. of zebra) | Mean 
|
P (Mean  = 0) |
+ | − | Best predictor (no. of zebra) | |
| βFloodplain | 0.815 | 0.163 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0.984 | 0.294 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| βGrassland | 0.347 | 0.242 | 5 | 1 | 0.331 | 0.379 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| βNP | 0.780 | 0.073 | 5 | 2 | 2 | −0.024 | 0.848 | 1 | 2 | |
| βMSI | 0.275 | 0.176 | 5 | 1 | −0.058 | 0.133 | 0 | 3 | ||
| βIJI | 0.209 | 0.390 | 4 | 3 | −0.052 | 0.505 | 2 | 2 | ||
The table illustrates the mean standardized coefficient and the number of significant coefficients (where the 5–95% confidence intervals did not include 0) for each RUF variable in each Delta region. The highest standardized β coefficient for each zebra is the best predictor of space use.