Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 2;3(9):3125–3140. doi: 10.1002/ece3.703

Table 3.

Properties of plants in the floral provisioning habitat

Species Total floral area Unweighted degree Weighted degree Node duration Betweenness centrality Closeness centrality Functional complementarity
Actaea racemosa 1422 3 4 4 0.05 0.92 4
Aquilegia canadensis 2201 6 10 9 0.49 0.96 7
Asclepias tuberosa 2829 20 55 11 1.36 1 16
Campanula rotundifolia 1332 4 4 14 0.82 0.96 2
Conoclinium coelestinum 1697 12 138 5 0.49 0.96 21
Coreopsis tripteris 9073 13 62 12 1.36 1 10
Desmodium canadense 20,877 3 5 8 0.05 0.92 5
Echinacea purpurea 5519 15 44 7 0.82 0.96 11
Eupatorium perfoliatum 19,375 16 338 14 1.36 1 23
Eupatorium purpureum 5663 9 36 9 0.49 0.96 13
Eurybia macrophylla 1718 16 116 7 1.36 1 19
Lespedeza capitata 8733 1 1 9 0 0.69 6
Liatris pycnostachya 28 11 43 3 0.49 0.96 14
Lysimachia quadrifolia 7836 2 2 5 0 0.75 1
Monarda fistulosa 105 9 61 6 0.82 0.96 24
Penstemon digitalis 5114 14 27 7 0.49 0.96 12
Phlox divaricata 2113 1 1 7 0 0.89 3
Pycnanthemum tenuifolium 8510 17 167 4 1.17 0.96 22
Senna hebecarpa 4419 2 8 14 0.05 0.92 15
Solidago rugosa 2520 11 46 7 0.49 0.96 9
Symphyotrichum novae-angliae 47,075 14 240 8 1.36 1 24
Symphyotrichum novi-belgii 27,590 12 67 14 1.36 1 18
Tradescantia ohiensis 22,207 10 17 20 1.36 1 8
Vernonia gigantea 5076 15 55 8 1.36 1 20
Veronicastrum virginicum 3897 24 104 8 1.36 1 17