. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Mar;51(0):264–277. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9529-3

Table 5.

Results of logistic regression models examining effects of intervention intensity on primary and secondary outcomes.

	Citations¹	Person hours²

Outcome	Time × Intensity B (95% CI)	Time × Intensity B (95% CI)
Use
Current use	−0.0017 (−0.0025, −0.0009)^***	−0.0011 (−0.0021, −0.0001)^**
Binge use	−0.0018 (−0.0028, −0.0008)^***	−0.0018 (−0.0030, −0.0006)^***
Perceived alcohol availability	−0.0007 (−0.0015, 0.0001)	0.0000 (−0.0010, 0.0010)
Likelihood of enforcement
Would be caught by police if drinking	0.0011 (0.0001, 0.0021)^**	0.0026 (0.0014, 0.0038)^***
Would be asked for proof of age	0.0002 (−0.0010, 0.0014)	0.0017 (0.0003, 0.0031)^**
Police would break up underage drinking party	0.0013 (0.0001, 0.0025)^**	0.0029 (0.0015, 0.0043)^***
Adult would not purchase alcohol for minor	0.0012 (0.0000, 0.0024)^**	0.0022 (0.0008, 0.0036)^***
Compliance sales	0.0021 (−0.0046, 0.0088)	−0.0034 (−0.0105, 0.0037)

As measured by the number of citations and verbal and written warnings issued for underage alcohol law violations.

As measured by the number of person hours devoted to enforcement of underage drinking laws.

p<.10

^**

p<.05

^***

p<.01

Note: the two measures were analyzed in separate models.