Table 4. Mean relative abundance of the dominant species in three types of lakes.
| Dominant species | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| RA(%) Mean±STDEV | RA(%) Mean±STDEV | RA(%) Mean±STDEV | |
| Ceriodaphnia cornuta | 0.7±0.04 | 0.1±0.3 | 5.4±10.2 |
| Bosmina coregoni | 14.8±19.0 | 1.1±2.9 | 21.5±17.5 |
| Moina micrura | 5.7±13.7 | 15.7±18.0 | 9.2±13.0 |
| Diaphanosoma brachyurum | 15.3±17.6 | 36.0±19.3 | 16.3±10.3 |
| Thermocyclops taihokuensis | 11.6±13.4 | 17.3±18.7 | 7.2±6.7 |
| Mesocyclops | 4.6±5.8 | 2.9±5.1 | 4.3±5.0 |
| Limnoithona sinensis | 3.1±7.3 | 0.1±0.5 | 7.7±11.3 |
| Schmackeria forbesi | 1.4±4.7 | 0.8±1.4 | 0.9±0.9 |
| Sinocalanus dorrii | 0.3±0.8 | 0.08±0.2 | 0.4±0.7 |
RA, Relative abundance; STDEV, standard deviation