Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 4;8(10):e76614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076614

Table 3. Summary of different comparative results.

Category Genetic model
OR(95%CI) Z P value I 2% P het* Effect model
Overall Dominant AA+GA vs. GG 1.45[1.20,1.76] 3.78 1.58E4 7.0 0.377 Fixed
Recessive AA vs. GA+GG 0.77[0.46,1.29] 0.98 0.326 0.0 0.692 Fixed
Additive AA vs. GG 0.79[0.45,1.37] 0.84 0.398 0.0 0.753 Fixed
Allele A vs. G 1.27[1.08,1.50] 2.88 0.004 5.9 0.386 Fixed
Asian Dominant AA+GA vs. GG 1.63[1.27,2.08] 3.89 1.01E4 0.0 0.439 Fixed
Recessive AA vs. GA+GG 0.91[0.46,1.77] 0.29 0.772 0.0 0.540 Fixed
Additive AA vs. GG 0.90[0.42,1.96] 0.26 0.796 0.0 0.552 Fixed
Allele A vs. G 1.45[1.17,1.80] 3.36 0.001 0.0 0.585 Fixed
nonAsian Dominant AA+GA vs. GG 1.20[0.88,1.64] 1.15 0.249 0.0 0.438 Fixed
Recessive AA vs. GA+GG 0.62[0.28,1.37] 1.18 0.239 0.0 0.939 Fixed
Additive AA vs. GG 0.68[0.30,1.51] 0.95 0.341 0.0 0.833 Fixed
Allele A vs. G 1.07[0.84,1.37] 0.54 0.588 0.0 0.394 Fixed

P het=P value for heterogeneity