Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 4;8(10):e75226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075226

Table 1. Comparison between 2009–2010 observed acute diarrhea incidence and the expected incidence estimated from previous years (2004–2009) in France.

Differences with 2009–2010 incidence low incidence expected incidence high incidence
Period between weeks 44 and 52 Incidence (/100 000) −209 608 −1,104
Number of cases −134,124 391,297 −710,282
% of increase or decrease −9% 24% −36%
Period between weeks 53 and 18 Incidence (/100 000) +2,019 +1, 501 +935
Number of cases +1,298,442 +965,737 +601,107
% of increase or decrease +62% +40% +22%
Entire studied period between weeks 44 and 18 Incidence (/100 000) +1,810 +893 −170
Number of cases +1,164,318 +574,440 −109,175
% of increase or decrease +34% +14.1% −2%

Low and high incidence scenarios are given by the bound of bootstrapped 95% confidence interval. The studied period is divided in two sub-periods, before and after the week 52 when the observed and expected incidences intersect.