Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 4;8(10):e75724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075724

Table 1. Sugar composition of the “hemicellulose rich” and “cellulose rich” fractions expressed as mg/g AIS.

“Hemicellulose rich” fraction
Knockoutline WT A1a A1c A1d A1i A2b A2d A3 A4a A4b A4e
Glucose 57.7±6.1 54.9±8.6 61.6±8.4 58.0±9.0 62.2±3.2 53.5±5.9 46.6±9.6 57.8±16.1 42.8±4.3 37.9±7.2 42.6±4.3
Xylose 133±1.5 120±8.8 130.0±13.8 131.8±3.6 140.1±10.4 134. 1±9.7 131.8±4.2 127.3±9.0 100.9±8.0 96.2±7.5 102.7±7.0
Galactose 15.5±5.6 23.4±2.4 19.4±6.8 12.4±1.8 25.2±2.2 23.0±2.0 24.6±2.7 24.3±2.8 18.0±1.1 15.5±3.3 16.2±4.7
“Cellulose rich” fraction
Knockout line WT A1a A1c A1d A1i A2b A2d A3 A4a A4b A4e
Glucose 411.8±19.0 382.3±7.9 392.4±39.9 373.3±36.3 389.7±32.7 348.5±33.9 330.2±34.7 382.5±20.4 373.1±28.1 414.9±29.3 413.6±20.4
Xylose 22.5±8.8 20.7±11.2 32.9±17.5 15.8±13.0 35.3±13.5 23.1±1.8 31.3±3.2 32.1±2.5 35.1±2.3 37.3±4.2 27.8±3.2