Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 2;4(3):149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2013.07.002

Table 3.

Prediction of daily musculoskeletal well-being, musculoskeletal pain, and surefootedness in multilevel regression analyses

Musculoskeletal well-being
Pain
Surefootedness
B SE B SE B SE
Constant 8.394 0.668 2.508 0.450 9.535 0.549
Sex −0.008 0.552 −0.328 0.372 −0.495 0.455
BMI 0.008 0.075 0.021 0.051 −0.045 0.062
Age 0.005 0.018 0.001 0.012 −0.006 0.015
LBP −0.230 0.160 0.302 0.110 −0.109 0.128
SR-WBV 0.218* 0.087 −0.063 0.072 0.203 0.051
Day 0.016 0.004 −0.005 0.003 0.001 0.002
Interaction effects
 Day × Training 0.016 0.006 0.002 0.005 0.013 0.003
 Training × LBP 0.176 0.074 −0.102 0.061 −0.026 0.043
 Day × LBP 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.003 0.001 0.002
 Training × Day × LBP −0.002 0.005 −0.010** 0.004 −0.001 0.003

*p < 0.05.

p < 0.01.

p < 0.001, two-tailed.

n = 3,324 daily pain ratings reported by 54 participants during 56 days.

Sex (0 = m, 1 = f), B, fixed parameter estimates of unstandardized regression coefficients; BMI, body mass index; CTSIB, clinical test of sensory integration on balance; Day, day of training period (1-28); LBP, frequency of low back pain during last 6 months prior to the study started; Pain, self-reported musculoskeletal pain on first day of the study; SE, standard error in unstandardized regression coefficients estimation. Significance levels were calculated by t-values (Parameter Estimate/SE) with j-p-1 degrees of freedom, where j is the number of units on level 2 and p is the number of explanatory variables; SR-WBV, Stochastic resonance whole-body vibration training (0 = control group, 1 = training group); surefootedness, self-reported perceived body balance on first day of the study.