Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 14;3:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.006

Table 3.

Correlations between discriminant scores and clinical scales.

With effect of age and gender
Without effect of age and gender
n r p (2-tailed) n r p (2-tailed)
I. AD score MMSE 36 − .363a .030a 36 − .478b .003b
ADAS 36 0.228 0.013a 36 0.322 0.009b
CDR-rating 36 .447b .006b 36 .388a .020a
CDR-sum 36 .483b .003b 36 .458b .005b
GDS 36 0.158 0.358 36 0.103 0.548
II. HD score MoCA 20 − 0.102 0.668 20 0.066 0.781
III. SCA6 score SARA 12 .745b .005b 12 0.519 0.083
IV. PPA_Sv score WAB AQ 15 − 0.2 0.475 15 − 0.411 0.128
WAB fluency 15 − 0.261 0.347 15 − 0.504 0.055
WAB sequential command 15 − 0.041 0.884 15 − 0.202 0.471
WAB repetition 15 0.247 0.374 15 0.036 0.898
V. PPA_NFv score WAB AQ 15 0.161 0.576 15 0.375 0.168
WAB fluency 15 0.05 0.859 15 0.061 0.829
WAB sequential command 15 0.174 0.535 15 0.225 0.421
WAB repetition 15 0.502 0.057 15 0.564 0.029a
VI. PPA_Lv score WAB AQ 15 − 0.286 0.302 15 − 0.475 0.074
WAB fluency 15 − 0.006 0.984 15 − 0.426 0.113
WAB sequential command 15 − 0.128 0.649 15 − 0.358 0.191
WAB repetition 15 − 0.338 0.218 15 − 0.382 0.16
VII. PPA_U score WAB AQ 15 0.186 0.508 15 0.268 0.334
WAB fluency 15 0.233 0.402 15 0.46 0.085
WAB sequential command 15 0.119 0.672 15 0.252 0.365
WAB repetition 15 − 0.255 0.36 15 − 0.073 0.797
a

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

b

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).