Table 2.

Summary of the classification of EEG-fMRI concordance levels

Name	# spikes in prolonged EEG	# spikes in fMRI scanner	# deactivation clusters	# activation clusters	MEM non-concordant and fMRI non-relevant	MEM non-concordant and α non-significant	MEM concordant and α non-significant	MEM non-concordant and fMRI relevant	MEM concordant and fMRI relevant
Patient 1	23	18	2	4	2	0	0	1	3
Patient 2	6	4	3	3	0	4	0	0	2
Patient 3	73	91	9	4	2	3	1	1	6
Patient 4	34	14	0	1	0	0	0	0	1
Patient 6	6	2	3	3	0	6	0	0	0
Patient 8	38	13	12	11	6	11	1	3	2
Patient 9	11	56	2	5	0	6	0	0	1
Total	–	–	31	31	10 (16%)	30 (49%)	2 (3%)	5 (8%)	15 (24%)

For each subject, we indicated the number of spikes used to create the average spike from the prolonged EEG, the number of spikes selected for fMRI data analysis, the number of fMRI clusters showing activations and deactivations and the classification of these clusters according to the 5 levels of EEG-fMRI concordance. The last row indicates the distribution of the classification levels for all the 62 clusters analyzed.