Table 3. Results of LTRE analyses comparing overall population dynamics and the contribution of single matrix elements to the overall population dynamics of A. ramosum in different habitats (open and forest) and years.
Open | Forest | Year 1 | Year 2 | Open-year 1 | Open-year 2 | Forest-year 1 | Forest-year 2 | ||
Seed | Seed | −0.005 | 0.005 | 0.002 | −0.002 | 0.006 | −0.009 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Flowering | Seed | 0.013 | −0.013 | 0.026 | −0.026 | 0.012 | 0.006 | −0.006 | −0.012 |
Seed | Seedling | 0.021 | −0.021 | 0.009 | −0.009 | −0.008 | 0.016 | −0.004 | −0.004 |
Flowering | Seedling | 0.008 | −0.008 | −0.015 | 0.015 | −0.023 | 0.072 | −0.037 | −0.012 |
Seedling | Small veg. | 0.015 | −0.015 | 0.007 | −0.007 | 0.003 | 0.030 | −0.017 | −0.017 |
Small veg. | Small veg. | 0.008 | −0.008 | −0.010 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.038 | −0.024 | −0.016 |
Large veg. | Small veg. | 0.001 | −0.001 | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.006 | −0.005 | 0.000 |
Flowering | Small veg. | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.001 | 0.010 | −0.004 | 0.001 | −0.007 |
Small veg. | Large veg. | −0.003 | 0.003 | −0.002 | 0.002 | −0.023 | 0.019 | −0.004 | 0.008 |
Large veg. | Large veg. | −0.004 | 0.004 | −0.008 | 0.008 | −0.022 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.018 |
Flowering | Large veg. | −0.009 | 0.009 | −0.002 | 0.002 | −0.015 | −0.014 | 0.010 | 0.020 |
Small veg. | Flowering | 0.011 | −0.011 | 0.004 | −0.004 | 0.011 | 0.013 | −0.001 | −0.023 |
Large veg. | Flowering | 0.022 | −0.022 | 0.014 | −0.014 | 0.024 | 0.027 | −0.014 | −0.037 |
Flowering | Flowering | 0.031 | −0.031 | 0.001 | −0.001 | −0.004 | 0.079 | −0.046 | −0.029 |
Overall | 0.647 | −0.647 | 0.140 | −0.140 | −0.085 | 0.847 | −0.435 | −0.327 |
The presented values indicate the magnitude of the contribution, with significant values (p≤0.025) shown in bold. For each factor, the contributions to the population growth rate of all levels of the given factor sum to zero. As a result, a positive contribution indicates that the transition increases the overall population growth at the given level of the factor, while a negative contribution indicates that the transition decreases the overall population growth at the given level of the factor. The negative contribution values therefore indicate that that specific transition represents a weak point in the life cycle at the given level of the factor.