Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 20;471(11):3588–3595. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3182-5

Table 1.

Univariate analysis

Category Uncemented implant (n = 4319) Cemented implant (n = 2179) p value*
Followup (years), mean (SD) 5.6 (4.8) 10.5 (5.3) < 0.0001
Age (years), mean (SD) 62.1 (12.1) 71.9 (10.2) < 0.0001
Cost of implant, mean (SD) $6074 ($1313) $4491 ($1646) < 0.0001
Sex
 Male 2055 (48%) 742 (34%) < 0.0001
 Female 2264 (52%) 1437 (66%)
Age categories (years)
 < 55 1119 (26%) 141 (6%) < 0.0001
 55–70 2051 (47%) 699 (32%)
 > 70 1149 (27%) 1339 (61%)
Procedural timeframe
 1991–1998 513 (12%) 1079 (50%) < 0.0001
 1999–2004 946 (22%) 787 (36%)
 2005–2011 2860 (66%) 313 (14%)
Primary diagnosis
 Osteoarthritis 3940 (91%) 1958 (90%) 0.07
 Aseptic necrosis 201 (5%) 104 (5%)
 Other 178 (4%) 117 (5%)
Stem revision reason
 Loosening related to wear/osteolysis 5 (8%) 5 (7%) NA
 Aseptic loosening 11 (17%) 45 (63%)
 Periprosthetic fracture 20 (31%) 3 (4%)
 Infection 7 (11%) 5 (7%)
 Dislocation 5 (8%) 10 (14%)
 Failure of bone ingrowth 12 (19%) 0 (0%)
 Mechanical failure/breakage 1 (2%) 1 (1%)
 Instability 0 (0%) 2 (3%)
 Pain 2 (3%) 0 (0%)
 Other 1 (2%) 0 (0%)

* Probability values were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and the Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables;  too many categories to calculate a meaningful p value; NA = not applicable.