Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 14;13(4):478–485. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0223-9

Table 1.

Shows the average surface roughness values collected from the individual tracings for each of the three different groups of specimens of two different manufacturers

Surface profilometry (Quantitative test showing Ra values for surface roughness)
Vita (Ra values in μm) Ivoclar (Ra values in μm)
S. no. Auto glazed (Control group) Study groups Auto glazed (Control group) Study groups
Re-glazed Chair side polished Re-glazed Chair side polished
1 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.12
2 0.14 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.13
3 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.12 0.12
4 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.11 0.12
5 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.12 0.12
6 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.13
7 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.1 0.12
8 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.12 0.12
9 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.12
10 0.15 0.1 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.12

Note More is the Ra value, more is the surface roughness or more is the Ra value less is surface smoothness or finish