Table 1.
Valence | Mother's feelingsa | Mother's perception of infant feelingsb | Emotional arousal ratingc | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Own | Unknown | Own | Unknown | Own | Unknown | |
Happy face | 1.15 ± 0.76 | 2.71 ± 0.84 | 1.21 ± 0.78 | 1.55 ± 0.83 | 4.91 ± 2.24 | 3.26 ± 1.58 |
Neutral face | 2.81 ± 0.85 | 3.86 ± 0.47 | 3.60 ± 0.59 | 3.93 ± 0.65 | 4.01 ± 1.60 | 2.67 ± 1.32 |
Sad face | 6.25 ± 1.18 | 5.23 ± 0.83 | 6.91 ± 0.70 | 6.80 ± 0.81 | 5.69 ± 1.66 | 3.80 ± 1.36 |
The ratings using 9-point Likert scales adapted from the Self-Assessment Manikin (Bradley and Lang, 1994) with the following benchmarks: 0 = positive, 4 = neutral, 8 = negative for mother's feelings and mother's perception of infant's feelings ratings; 0 = calm, 8 = aroused for emotional arousal rating.
“How pleasant or unpleasant did the picture make you feel?” Main effect of valence: F(2, 76) = 281.28, p < 0.001.
“How do you think the baby was feeling?” Main effect of valence: F(2, 76) = 713.83, p < 0.001.
While statistical tests were conducted using log-transformed data, untransformed data are reported here for clarity of interpretation.
Main effect of valence: F(2, 76) = 20.73, p < 0.001; Main effect of identity: F(1, 38) = 42.98, p < 0.001. No interaction effect.