Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 25;28(10):1443–1448. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.10.1443

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier estimates of RFS between CD9-positive GST and CD9-negative GST group. The hazard ratio for RFS in the CD9-positive group was 0.104 (95% CI, 0.021 to 0.528; P = 0.006) compared with the CD9-negative group. RFS curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between the curves were tested for statistical significance using Log-rank statistics.