Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2012 Jan 11;307(2):182–192. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1966

Table 4.

Potential Sources of Bias for 16 Validated General Prognostic Indices

INDEX Adequate description of sample, (Participation rate)a Clearly defined, reproducible prognostic variablesb Blinded measurement of potential prognostic variables and mortalityc Completeness of potential predictorsd Completeness of mortality outcomee Model building is conceptually based, stability of model testedf
Community
Gagne 201131 Partly
Race/ethnicity not described (participation not optional in this administrative dataset)
Partly
ICD-9 codes have limited reproducibility
Yes NR NR Partly
Stability of model not tested
Mazzaglia 200724 Partly
Race/ethnicity not described (Italian sample), participants not compared with non-participants
Partly
“Inadequacy of income” not well described
Yes NR 99% Yes
Carey 200415 Partly
No comparison of respondents to non- respondents
Yes Yes 99.3% NR Yes
Carey 200814 Yes (participation not optional in this administrative dataset) Yes Yes 92% NR No
Not conceptually based; stability of model not tested
Lee 200622 Partly
Participants not compared with non-participants (81% participation rate)
Yes Yes NR 98% Yes
Schonberg 200930 Partly
Participants not compared with non-participants (74% participation rate)
Yes Yes 95% 97% Yes
Nursing Home
Porock 200526 Partly
Comorbities not described (participation not optional in this administrative dataset)
Yes Yes NRg >99% linkage to Missouri death certificates Yes
Flacker 200320 Yes (participation not optional in this administrative dataset) Yes Yes NR 87% Yes
Hospital
di Bari 201016 Partly
Race/ethnicity not described (Italian sample); “admitted for medical reasons” not clear; (participation not optional in this administrative dataset)
Partly
Admission to “day hospital” not clearly defined
Yes 91% linkage across 4 datasets, 0% after linkage 91% linkage across 4 datasets, including mortality No
Not conceptually based; stability not tested
Fischer 200618 Yes Yes Partly
For validation, 10% blinded chart review with 100% agreement
NR 98% Partly
Final predictors for model selected a priori; stability not tested
Inouye 200321 Partly
Participants not compared with non-participants (86% participation rate)
Partly
ICD-9 codes have limited reproducibility
Yes >99% for all predictors 100% Yes
Pilotto 200825 Partly
Race/ethnicity not described (Italian sample), participants not compared with non-participants (80% participation rate)
Yes Yes 90% 82% Yes
Teno 200033 Partly
Race/ethnicity and participation rate not described
Yes Yes 81% 100% Yes
Levine 200723 Partly
Participation rate not reported
Partly
ICD-9 codes have limited reproducibility
Yes NR >99% No
Not conceptually based; stability not tested
Walter 200132 Partly
Participation rate not described.
Yes Yes 96% 100% Yes
Drame 200817 Partly
Race/ethnicity not described (French sample) (87% participation rate)
Yes Yes NR 92% No
Not conceptually based; stability of model not tested
a

Sample description: study and source populations clearly defined and study sample clearly described (age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, baseline mortality rates), enrollment procedures clear and, unless administrative data, comparison of participants and non-participants (Yes/Partly/No/Unsure). Participation rates provided for studies requiring consent.

b

Prognostic variables defined: clear, reproducible measures (Yes/Partly/No/Unsure). ICD-9 codes rated partly due to concerns about reproducibility.43

c

Blinding: developers of the prognostic index were blinded to the measurement of potential prognostic variables and mortality outcomes (Yes/Partly/No/Unsure). Secondary analyses of existing data categorized as yes.

d

Completeness of Predictors: % sample with complete predictors

e

Completeness of Mortality: % sample with complete follow up or % successful linkage to vital statistics records (e.g. National Death Index)

f

Model building: Selection of potential predictors is conceptually based, and stability of model by varying assumptions and/or modeling techniques is tested (Yes/Partly/No/Unsure)

Abbreviations: NR=not reported; SS#= social security number; DOB=date of birth