Table 1. The correspondence between assessor scores for the WT dataset.

		Second Assessor
		1	2	3	4
First assessor	1	60 (42)	97	13	0
	2	104	229 (222)	76	1
	3	12	59	42 (23)	8
	4	0	3	6	6 (0.3)

Table gives the number of papers rated 1 to 4 for the WT data. Figures in parentheses are the numbers expected by chance alone. Note the ordering of assessors is of no consequence in the WT data since the assessments were performed simultaneously and independently.